In 2025, Dordick Law Corporation spent the year doing what it does best: representing people across Southern California through mediations, trials, and every stage of the legal process. It was a year defined not just by litigation but by meaningful verdicts and settlements that made a real difference in the lives of those affected by serious injuries and wrongdoing. Behind every case was a strong commitment to accountability and justice. Below are some of the most impactful results Dordick Law Corporation achieved throughout 2025.
$115 Million Verdict: Alexandra Gucci Zarini vs Patricia Gucci and Joseph Ruffalo
This landmark civil judgment reflects the important role the civil justice system can play in addressing harm and promoting accountability, particularly in situations where other avenues may not fully serve survivors. The Dordick Law Corporation team, led by Gary A. Dordick and Taylor B. Dordick, played a key role in achieving this outcome through careful advocacy and a sustained commitment to supporting survivors of sexual abuse in their pursuit of justice.
$31 Million Settlement: Defective Pool Drain / Wrongful Death
Dordick Law Corporation secured a $31 million partial settlement in a fatal pool accident case against multiple responsible parties, including property management companies, pool maintenance providers, and the product manufacturer. The case uncovered a pattern of negligence that contributed to the tragedy.
$30.9 Million Settlement for Multiple Plaintiffs: Wildfire Caused by Negligence
Dordick Law Corporation secured a 30.9-million-dollar settlement for clients who suffered devastating losses in a Southern California wildfire. The blaze, which spread rapidly through a residential community, destroyed homes and tragically claimed lives. It was later determined that the fire had been caused by negligent conduct during high-risk fire weather conditions.
$25.3 Million Settlement: Homeowners v County Representative Action, Mitigation Fee Act
This matter first required overcoming a statute of limitations challenge that was resolved by the Court of Appeal in a published opinion. The defendants then advanced multiple arguments aimed at circumventing the refund requirement. Despite these efforts and across three phases of trial, our team persisted, and the court ultimately ruled in our favor, securing a substantial $25.3 million compensation for our clients and refunds for homeowners throughout the county.
